October 7, 2002
Law Bars a National System for Tracing Bullets and Shells
By FOX BUTTERFIELD
he
technology exists to create a national ballistic fingerprint
system that would enable law enforcement officials to trace
bullets recovered from shootings, like those fired by the
Washington-area sniper, to a suspect.
Such a system would have been of great use in the Washington
case, in which six people were shot to death, because so far
bullet fragments are virtually the only evidence.
But because of opposition by the gun industry and the
National Rifle Association, only two states have moved to set up
a ballistic fingerprint system, and Congress has prohibited a
national program, experts say.
"I definitely think that the technology is there, and it
has been refined to the point where it is cost effective,"
said Joe Vince, a former chief of the crime guns analysis branch
of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.
"It would not be an imposition on the manufacturers or
law enforcement or citizens, so I'm all for it," said Mr.
Vince, who is now president of Crime Gun Solutions, a consulting
company in Frederick, Md.
Now, the police can tell only whether bullet fragments or
shell casings found at a crime scene match one another and come
from the same gun. This information helps establish whether only
one weapon was involved.
But without the gun itself, the police cannot go the next
step and use this information to try to trace the shooter.
Even the technology that enables the firearms bureau to match
bullet fragments or shell casings to one gun is new. A system
was installed in 1999 after encouragement by the Clinton
administration, Mr. Vince and other experts said.
This system, known as the National Integrated Ballistics
Information Network, optically scans the markings on bullets or
shell casings, converting them into an electronic signature.
This information is stored in a database and can be retrieved by
computers in 235 police departments around the nation.
Gun control advocates and some law enforcement authorities
like Mr. Vince have long advocated taking the next step,
requiring gun manufacturers to keep an electronic record of the
markings from bullets and shell casings when new guns are test
fired. This data would be kept with the serial numbers of the
guns.
With this information, the agency would be able to trace
bullets and shell casings found at a shooting site to the gun
maker and eventually to the buyer, said Mr. Vince and another
former high ranking firearms bureau official.
But the National Rifle Association has opposed this, calling
it tantamount to a national gun registry. The group succeeded in
getting a provision in the 1968 federal Gun Control Act
outlawing any national gun registry.
"This is just another example of N.R.A. paranoia about
gun registration, which prevents effective law
enforcement," said Dennis Henigan, the legal director of
the Brady Campaign Against Gun Violence.
Only Maryland and New York require gun makers to provide
test-fired samples of bullets and shell casings when they sell a
gun. Their programs have had limited effectiveness because they
are new and because guns used in crimes could have been sold in
so many other states.
Copyright
The New York Times Company
|