WEBSTER GROVES, Mo.
- Gov. Bob Holden vetoed a concealed weapons
bill today, but the sponsor of the legislation remained
confident it will become law.
Holden signed the veto in suburban St. Louis -- an
area of the state that played a big role in defeating
1999's Proposition B, a ballot measure that would have
allowed Missourians to carry concealed guns.
Seventy-eight percent of the voters in this community
voted against it.
"You and I clearly agree putting more guns in
people's hands does not reduce crime," Holden said
over catcalls from about one dozen pro-gun protesters.
At one point they chanted, "One-term Bob!"
while the governor spoke.
Holden said he had several concerns about the bill,
such as inadequate training requirements; no provision
for a gun safety refresher course; and lack of an
adequate database to make sure the mentally ill can't
get weapons. He also said that under the proposal people
convicted of misdemeanor domestic abuse would be allowed
to carry weapons.
Both the House and Senate supported a bill that would
allow people 23 and older who have taken handgun
training courses to apply to their county sheriffs for
concealed gun permits. The bill also allows anyone 21 or
older to conceal guns in the passenger compartment of a
vehicle without a permit.
The veto comes just two days after Jonathon Russell
walked into the Jefferson City plant where he worked and
began shooting, killing three people and wounding five
others. He later killed himself.
"He went into a workplace where even the
security guard wasn't armed," said Rep. Larry
Crawford, a Republican from California, Mo., and sponsor
of the House version of the concealed weapons bill.
"He knew that law-abiding citizens there couldn't
be armed, and that gave him the upper hand."
Crawford said rallies in several towns in support of
the concealed weapons bill, scheduled for today, were
canceled out of respect for the victims of the Jefferson
City shooting and their families.
Lawmakers will consider overriding the veto in
September. Crawford was confident there are plenty of
votes to override in the House. And although it will be
close in the Senate, he felt the override would pass
there, too.
"We think that hangs on one lawmaker who could
switch his vote," Crawford said. "We think we
have that vote." Crawford would not identify the
potential swing voter.
Supporters say the 2003 version of the concealed
weapons bill is substantially different than the 1999
ballot proposal, which lost by a 52-48 percent vote,
largely because opponents in the St. Louis and Kansas
City areas outnumbered supporters outstate. The new
version includes additional safeguards such as
fingerprinting for criminal background checks.
Crawford said people feel differently now. He noted
that three more states -- Minnesota, New Mexico and
Colorado -- adopted concealed weapons laws this year.
National Rifle Association spokeswoman Kelly Hobbs
said 35 states already have measures similar to the one
proposed here, and others allow concealed weapons in
some circumstances.
Crawford said the law would make Missouri a safer
place and give criminals something to think about.
"Right now, Missourians are forced to leave
their homes unprotected, and criminals know that,"
Crawford said.
Opponents said the law would lead to more bloodshed,
not less.
"What we've seen from other places is that it is
more likely that someone will be injured either in anger
or by accidental discharge by having more small weapons
available than the unlikely event that crime will be
deterred," said Vicky Riback Wilson, a Columbia
Democrat.
|
vwilso01@services.state.mo.us
Representative Wilson:
Does your quote in the
St. Louis Post-Dispatch have any basis in fact
that can be substantiated, or was this simply
a media opportunity to express opinion
disguised as fact?
``What we've seen from
other places is that it is more likely that
someone will be injured either in anger or by
accidental discharge by having more small
weapons available than the unlikely event that
crime will be deterred,'' said Vicky Riback
Wilson, D-Columbia.
Please provide me with
the statistical data from which both of the
flawed premises in your statement are derived.
I will assume that no response to this message
within 15 days will represent either an
unwillingness, or inability, to provide such
data. I am truly open to evaluate any
factually substantiating information you may
have.
Thank you serving the
people of Missouri, although only a
select minority of the people. I
understand that requires courage, especially
when it involves an issue as deeply steeped in
misinformation and baseless fear
mongering as this one is.
Sincerely,
Richard A. Hime
P.O. Box 916
Raymore, MO 64083-0916
|
The legislation is HB349.