| . | |
| Here is the "summary" of a report
for the Senate Subcommittee on
Oversight of Government Management, Restructuring, and the
District of Columbia, Committee on Governmental Affairs prepared by the
GAO [Government Accounting Office], a creature of the legislative branch
that remains staffed by "hard left" bureaucrats. The
entire report is available as a 39 page PDF [Portable Document File] at http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-02-653 . |
|
|
|
|
|
July 2002 GUN CONTROL Potential Effects of
Next-Day Destruction |
|
|
|
|
|
Results in Brief While routine system audits may not be adversely affected by DOJ’s proposed requirement for next-day destruction of records, other current uses of NICS records would be affected, with consequences for public safety and NICS operations. The FBI is considering certain actions to mitigate these effects but these actions would not cover all consequences. The FBI has drafted plans that would address most potential effects of the proposed policy for next-day destruction of records. In developing these plans, the FBI reviewed each area of NICS operations and identified the changes needed in computer systems, work processes, policies, and procedures.8 According to NICS officials, under the FBI’s plans, most areas of NICS operations would not be adversely affected. The FBI’s plans also show that many routine audits currently conducted monthly or quarterly—such as audits of the accuracy of NICS examiners’ decisions—would have to be conducted on a real-time (hourly or daily) basis by adding more staff and changing procedures. NICS officials told us, however, that the FBI would not lose any routine audit capabilities under the proposed policy for next-day destruction of records. On the other hand, a next-day destruction policy would adversely affect certain nonroutine audits of the system. Specifically, under current DOJ policy, if a law enforcement agency has information that indicates that an individual is prohibited from purchasing firearms under federal law, the agency may request that the FBI check whether the name appears in NICS records of allowed transfers. If the FBI finds a record showing an allowed transfer to a "prohibited person" (e.g., a transfer to an alien who is illegally or unlawfully in the United States), that record indicates a potential violation of law, and the FBI may disclose the record to the appropriate law enforcement entity. These audits of the accuracy of responses given by NICS, and the additional (secondary) benefit of assisting law enforcement investigations, generally would not be possible under a nextday destruction policy. Also, a next-day destruction policy would adversely affect some aspects of current NICS operations, which would have public safety implications and could lessen the efficacy of current operations. Regarding public safety, the FBI would lose certain abilities to initiate firearm-retrieval actions when new information reveals that individuals who were approved to purchase firearms should not have been. Specifically, during the first 6 months of the current 90-day retention policy, the FBI used retained records to initiate 235 firearm-retrieval actions, of which 228 (97 percent) could not have been initiated under the proposed next-day destruction policy.9 Also, a next-day destruction policy could lengthen the time needed to complete background checks and place additional burdens on law enforcement agencies, including state and local courts, because NICS examiners, while researching new transactions, may have to make repeat calls for information that otherwise would have been retained in audit log records. Furthermore, the FBI would be less able to respond to (1) gun dealer questions about completed transactions and (2) purchaser and congressional questions related to the NICS appeals process, because information on allowed firearms transfers may not be available at the time of inquiry. The FBI is considering actions that could partially mitigate the adverse effects of a next-day destruction policy on NICS operations.Finally, ATF headquarters officials told us that a next-day destruction policy would not affect ATF’s ability to inspect gun dealer records. However, our work indicates that the effect of such a policy on ATF inspections is unclear. For example, under the proposed next-day destruction policy, NICS records of allowed firearms transfers would no longer be available for a detailed comparison with dealer records of the purportedly same transactions. Officials at the five ATF field offices we contacted provided mixed views on the value of current comparisons of NICS records with gun dealer records. If the proposed next-day destruction policy is implemented, ATF plans to replace the detailed comparisons with a "recheck" procedure, under which ATF inspectors would request that the FBI rerun selected NICS checks based on information taken from gun dealer records. On June 24, 2002, in commenting on a draft of this report, DOJ said that our primary concern regarding a possible inability to retrieve a relatively small number of erroneously transferred firearms was unfounded because (1) DOJ is considering an option to retain the federal firearms dealer’s identification number for 90 days and (2) ATF has ample investigative avenues for retrieving firearms. We disagree; our analysis indicates that these may be only partial solutions. |
|